The system is mainly built upon connecting companies with the consultants from all around the world. The consultants will have access to corporate cases presented by companies to analyze thoroughly and provide solutions, individually or within groups.
Companies post issues as
many as they want
Companies will rate the
solutions and skills
Consultants will get paid for
solutions and ratings
"Global positioning, Domestic application, Glocal solutions."
Find any service within minutes and know exactly what
you’ll pay. No hourly rates, just a fixed price.
Payment is released to the consultants once you’re
pleased and approve the work you get.
We’re here for you, anything from answering any
questions to resolving any issues, at any time.
One-time Cost-effective subscription for an unlimited amount of cases periodically to be presented to top-notch consultants worldwide reached within fingertips.
One-stop-shop for all kinds of qualified professionals in all industries and fields seeking to learn, gain, collaborate, and show their skills in consulting companies from all over the world.
IT Project Management
Lean Service Operations
Supply Chain Management
Market Entry Strategy
Business Plan DevelopmentExample
Sales & Pricing
How are social standards controlled? Do social media and education only manipulate it? Is proper unbiased education still a mystery? Why does social media witness fast-changing social transformations on a recurrent basis? Does it promote a ‘free’ structure for all kinds of individuals to use? Who decides its fame: people or groups? How are most social stars formed? Is business involved in reshaping morals through different internet mediums? Media in all forms has controlled the systemic norms and standards of humans [ap_dropcaps style="ap-normal"]S[/ap_dropcaps]ocial media witnessed an unusual and systematic transformation in the last 10 years. Prior to that, it was merely for connecting individuals with each other from around the world as friends or strangers. Now, it is leaning towards becoming more “weaponized.” According to analysts on popularity by social media, most famous individuals are chosen particularly and determined by bodies shaping social media algorithms. These notable individuals become highly influential to regimes, thinking, attitude, manners, demeanor, and belief. As traditions and family teachings that once were the primary institution to ethics and morals, where the school is supposed to be the secondary institution, social media have circumvented both. According to reports on modern ethics and morals, children with access to social media have shown a massive displacement from both primary and secondary moral teachings only to represent the ideals and personas of the popular content on social media. Individuals of the 21st century are growing astray from the diverse and cultural norms into a unified, cosmographic, set of standards and character, which often “defy cultural and belief standards.” The evolution of man's social morals is "decaying through time," which means evolving correctly according to certain world order, as pointed out by researchers on human evolution. According to a simulation on the popular influence, the followers of famous individuals on social media are known as “victims to the social cognitive dissidence." Fame comes at a heavy price, as indicated by a famous individual on social media, “it pushed me to become more socially outcasted in reality, but more involved digitally.” Many incidents were reported where a man of high social standards was shifted astray because of the need for more fame and followers. As explained in “renovating social media to what's necessary for tomorrow,” morals are the first victim to fame where they must be precisely adapted to the demands of the environment and controllers of the norms, given the frequent changing behavior that influences the young, gullible minds of today for a specific purpose and awareness perceptivity. According to observations by investigators, “have you seen the recent famous American singers? It’s pathetic,” adding, “some have confessed to having supplied the ‘bill’ of fame by regime-influencing bodies to ‘degrade’ the audience.” Such stars are experiencing high levels of fame and financial prosperity that are not necessarily dictated by the people or the number of followers. According to a survey on modern teen American rappers, a substantial portion of people dislike their type of music, quoting that their art is "merely risque, untalented, immature, idiotic, and pornographic in content." Yet, their popularity increases, which concludes the involvement of certain bodies to composing their popularity. The so-called 'thinning' objectives seem to be revolving around mental weakening more than what action movies dictate. When minds are weaker and focus is on a devised social issue effected by agenda-setting tactics, sleight of hand professionals can rule the world. It is quite unfortunate that artists, leaders, or entities are more judged by their follower base on social media than the content they are delivering. According to new users, social media identifies specific individuals, usually with a high follower base, on their first access to the accounts so as to drive people to support them regardless of free selection or choice. The original purpose of these systems is to allow a globalized form of behavior and norms so that individuals from all cultures would adhere to a single and specified features of “character.” Publicly, that is known as “civilization and assimilation to acceptable social norms.” Privately, it is known as “manipulating behaviors and social standards.” Social media is a “biased system“ that allows certain content over others. According to reports, its level of controlled propaganda very recently matched those of news media through the way of distribution. If all news sources are either state-controlled or opposition-manipulated, free speech platforms are influenced, and social media is dominated, where does a free and accurate representation of information go? Education contributed to a controlling of ideologies in society In education, the purpose of teaching is to instill the fundamental understanding of knowledge and sciences for an individual to pave the road deeper into a specific field or direction for future integration or adaptation of processes or procedures in order to grow the surrounding environment, and hence the world. As explained in “Everything bad is manmade,” humans are superior to other animals and living things that their purpose is to maintain and grow the prosperity of the world around us to the better in all relevant terms of "betterness." In the last century, education suffered an increasing level of disproportionality in terms of equal access to knowledge between countries according to “development and civilization.” According to reports, developed western countries have a better quality of education than developing or emerging countries. This is also represented by the ranking of institutions, which encourages aspiring students from other world countries to migrate and demand knowledge of the “Civilized West.” As identified by few employers in developing countries, “we no doubt favor individuals with academic degrees from America or Europe.” According to families of students who studied in the West, “our children came back with a different kind of thinking than before.” Individuals most often appropriate the norms of the new soil they attend to in order to adapt and cope with the social norms and acceptable standards that may, also, be largely differing from theirs back home. As explained in “Eliminating distortion by empowering accurate history and precise education 220.127.116.11,” education is highly distorted and manipulated, extending to all forms of distortion and premeditated selection, which prompts the need for a restructured way of institution and availability of the adequate quality of education in all countries thereof. The power retained by search engines and influence on data is larger than governing bodies Search engines, the sites that rewrote the way humans can find and retrieve information, are tremendously increasing in power and authority. The place where all kinds of data are located and managed by a single entity was an “ever coming technology that was always projected to be one-sidedly controlled in the future,” according to intelligence veterans, “imagine controlling the global library, filtering its books, sorting their importance, manipulating their content, favoring the few over others, influencing their strategies over the user’s protocols, and presenting what the reader wants without their consent.” The unreliable equality promised between all races, cultures, and religions that world bodies legislated seem to be largely lacking, as demonstrated by such platforms. According to information strategists, “[search engines] are using a very specifically formulated type of prejudice against a very few groups of people,” he also adds, “it’s not even hidden.” The quick access to data was a renovation in terms of technology and innovation. As globalization increases and data goes "big," its management requirement also evolved. However, search engines directly contributed to reduced human patience to the journey of finding and filtering of the necessary information, opening the door to all sorts of results to a search. As explained in "The human intelligence is at risk from perpetual development and ever-increasing speed," humans are prone to continuous devolution of intellectual intelligence and responses, given the increasing speed of machinery and technology that is directly correlated with intelligence deterioration. Our comfort in processes is the reason behind reduced innovation and narrower thinking. Demanding an accurate and proper news media and information spheres is a first step towards rewriting history. It will be a stepping stone towards bringing cultures from around the world to resolve the conflicts and peacefully coexist rather than focusing on non-transparency and intentional non-coexistence.
How are EU laws enforced on member states? Are national interests covertly prevailing? What values are ignored that promote internal dissociation? How are national constitutions exercising the fundamental European rules of law? Are relationships breaking apart ever since BREXIT? Who are the leaders that are firmly holding onto the collective values? With the definite upcoming change in domestic leaderships, is Europe going to remain a “European Union?” The evolution from a Union to Separate identities is stimulated by the "Too Big to Fail" attitude [ap_dropcaps style="ap-normal"]E[/ap_dropcaps]mmanuel Macron and his government have defied European law. That’s the first thought that comes to the minds of the residents to the visibly decaying European bonds. Member states such as France have been facing challenging times ever since the migration crisis, BREXIT, and COVID. Provided that freedom qualities are explicit in the transcending book of the law, fending off external troubles and shaky environment politics provoked a higher level of dissatisfaction, dissolution, and disapproval of leadership. The proactivity of the ECJ and EU law enforcers under the TFEU and other treaties present a profoundly hierarchical norm between "states and state" that, according to former officials, the genuinely ruling points are "almost unknown or unseen." Most of Europe’s governments are leaning towards advancing local interests for better civilian satisfaction with sovereign state legislations, scorning the more critical internal judicial structure of the Union. Therefore, in its basis and increasingly changing demographic of the Union, national sovereignty is in question. According to reports, the mindset of the original EU signators has drastically evolved to the modern-feature government and geopolitical condition that is likely to continue promoting more divergent objectives. In that sense, several member states are defying European law or order one way or another, which is why the union is facing unusual organizational troubles. The oversight by the commission and entities responsible for keeping the pillars of order affirmed are “not competent enough." The seemingly advisory and limited enforcement role undertaken by their boards, relying on member states' continuous engagement, established less stringent norms of centralization that promoted divided decision-making responsibilities between nations of an integral state. Unfortunately, according to a simulation on abuse of power, if a leading member state government, which houses the commissionary bodies and European courts associated with EU laws and free rights enforcement, defied an EU law, how efficient and stringent would the proceedings be? Will it be identical to the situation of G W Bush in the USA? The unique order and crises met by member states influenced theoretically closed borders and unusual departures The intention to remain in a closed border with free trade and movement coherently with other states that retain different cultures and traditions may sometimes be “overwhelming,” as identified by a group of European nationalists. Since the migration crisis, which enabled large waves of movement from East Europe to the West, the issue of sovereignty and "existential crisis" began drawing attention. According to statistics, the portion of naturalized migrants becoming European citizens will exceed the native local families in the near future, with increased access to government and power. Cultural separatism also took place "to filter the genuine [locals] from the others." This issue led to a more "closed" internal system, given the outside borders are opened. The importance associated with nationalizing interests and affairs over realizing collaboration is on a tipping scale with the changing spectrum of politics. As parties and missions shift, so does the sociopolitical structure. According to forecasts on governance in Europe, the governments of tomorrow will be quite different and more "ethnocentric" in nature, pushing for a closed European border. The struggle between far-right ethnocentricity and far-left socialism between bodies of the same borders created uncommon alliances outside of the border and irregular internal strategies for European control towards the coming years and 2030. As explained in "What is democracy?" international organizations and developed countries are planning for a more cosmocratic government and control, favoring the "originals" over the others. “Too much freedom, or too much restraint?” the question that posed a social dilemma to the native Europeans on account of preexisting traditions or predominant qualities. Brexit was a very uncommon and unpleasant experience for a union based on a robust geopolitical and economic collection of countries. Solidarity in the departure corresponded to the monarchy’s acknowledgment of the fact that Britons are unhappy with European political formations and power leakage to a higher centralized hierarchy. The scope of disassembling traditions revealed the regularity of “freedom from freedom,” which is yet, again, explaining member states’ emphasis on the national rule of law and power. According to a survey on Brexit in Europe, many Europeans are happy to let them go due to the distinct geosocial structure. France's government in the face of European values and freedoms Maryam, the French detainee by a Mali extremist group, was freed recently and returned to France after her near four years of captivity. Her return was a real turning point for Emmanuel Macron. The French President on that day sought to speak about Islam extremism and ideological separatism, but did not proceed due to the surprise encountered by a former Sophie turned Maryam French citizen, who hopes to return later and help the people of Mali. Emmanuel Macron in the last weeks has been gradually igniting rage and public opinion against Islam in the name of voicing "belief or nonbelief" and freedom of expression, using French "Laicite," or secularism, and European values as the features behind his "dissatisfaction with the increased Islam numbers." According to sources, he also said that "blasphemy is covered by the freedom of expression" through his speech during a naturalization ceremony, which contributed to heightened resentment from the Muslim community. His statements led to increased frustration and demonstrations against the religion behind the coat of freedom and protection of thought. This internal chaos developed after the murder of a middle school teacher by a refugee extremist on the 16th of October, 2020, in Paris. The teacher negatively and subjectively portrayed the religion of Islam by using Charlie Hebdo’s slandering caricature, defaming the image of Prophet Muhammad following the ongoing trials on the case against the killings of 2015. The teacher's class was on secularism and “freedom” of expression where, according to reports, “he asked Muslim students to leave if they would feel bad.” The teacher’s teaching moment was inciting a biased perspective by the Christian-Secular turned majority, neglecting the importance of cultural equality and rights to religious protection. According to witnesses, his remarks attacked the feelings of the minority group of Islam without consensus on the subject, where the education system of the country “needed better surveillance on the appropriated rights and values with even stronger oversight on the selection of teacher quality and intellect to avoid extreme incidents.” According to ECHR case law E.S vs. Austria, 38450/12 of 25/10/2018, the court concluded that any expression against Prophet Muhammad is not freedom, upholding the judgment of the domestic criminal and supreme courts in Vienna, where the offender shall be penalized accordingly. The reason came due to “the rights of others to have their religious feelings protected and preserving religious peace in the region. Any impugned statements beyond the permissible limits of an objective debate, or classified as an abusive attack on the prophet of Islam, could stir up prejudice.” As Emmanuel Macron is influencing prejudice in the name of a fundamental in a democracy, he is seemingly abusing his position of power as the head of a leading European state with the largest Islamic population retention in Western Europe, and President of the French Republic. His constant recognition that Islam is “a religion in crisis all over the world” and the continuous use of "Islamic separatism" is inciting backlash from the Muslim groups and clashes with extremists from other religions and beliefs. Psychologically speaking, the followers of Emmanuel Macron, far-right’s Marine Le Pen, far-right youth groups, and the majority Islamophobic population‘s reaction to such announcements against Islam and radicalism will proceed to turn turmoil against the minority religion with a certain response from a “counter society of extremists" that the country has long tried to avoid. The collection is cranking up discrimination and generalized hatred, in addition to anti-immigration targeting, against acceptable and imposed European norms of freedom to religion by stereotyping more than specifying. According to a simulation on the developments of this religious debate, the aftermath will spike religious conflicts and tragic events by disregarding the standards provided by human rights and conceding "blasphemy" to be a part of 'French freedom.' As the government and Union already comprehend, the religion of Islam's symbols are very sacred, where any attack would surely ignite anger and hatred, and hence stimulate a specific response. Instead of leading by example and resolving the problems, the national ruler exhibited a democratic fundamental by substituting harmony with escalation, peace with anger, and equality with hatred, evolving perception into new norms of potent non-coexistence. The steps undertaken by the republic seem to be a devised strategy to eradicating the religion’s amicable presence in the country and forwardly in the majority Catholic-Christian continent that historically faced centuries of religious battles. As explained in “Everything bad is manmade,” groups nowadays are leaning towards non-coexistence with the religion of Islam. According to witnesses, police and law enforcers in the country have witnessed a jump in cases on "subjective obstruction to Muslim individuals and Islamic neighborhoods under suspicion without cause.” Mosques around the republic following the incident started receiving threats, which prompted police protection against other beliefs' extremism. Rather than suppressing hatred and discrimination, peace and tranquility were subdued. If capturing merely the public violations of France’s government, the European Court of Justice would observe abuse of power, attempting to incite social unrest and extremism, attempting to ignite prejudice against a minority group, attempting to stimulate subjective policing, attempting to arouse idiosyncratic opinion and emotions, escalation of a social crisis, disturbance to a religion’s peace and protection, expression of malicious statements against a symbol of religion, and both direct and indirect violation to European law on religious protected feelings and ECHR approved judgment 38450/12.
How is COVID advancing so far? Is the spike in cases from mid-October of 2020 a normal phenomenon? What are governments doing to maneuver against virus attacks? Can we genuinely blame the premature reopening of countries? Are we being dragged into a stage of forced vaccination? Would anti-COVID medications that are on the verge of emerging be the reason behind global differences and growth interruption? What is stopping healthcare from reaching its full potential? COVID’s history throughout 2020 shows evolving facts and theories [ap_dropcaps style="ap-normal"]A[/ap_dropcaps]ccording to conspiracy theorists, forced vaccinations will integrate nanochips that will connect to 5G cell towers worldwide so that world governments, or government, can monitor us easier and control our health and wealth with the integration of a cashless society. Not that reasons for such kinds of theories are ill based or illogical, but abnormal world developments beyond natural and reasonable comprehension are transcribing in a speedy fashion, which promoted public thought in this direction. Understandably, distinct compound vaccinations are being developed by different companies in varying developed countries worldwide, where the intended objective and outcome should be identical in nature. Yet, forecasts show that world stages will become very unusual and challenging in nature. According to medical insights, the coronavirus seems to be evolving since its original state or initial release into the public. Already recovered individuals are being infected again without developing a specific molded immunity, identifying a differing type of compound or virus complex that is also acknowledged as "possibly airborne." The development COVID is experiencing is getting more uncertain by the day, hence the utility of the adenovirus in most vaccinations that are underway to cease COVID’s elemental composition or formation. On the other hand, some medical professionals from emerging countries seem to have a completely different perspective on the matter. According to social media sources, a pharmacist from Beirut, Lebanon, has identified the most efficient and most straightforward preventive measures to protect humans from COVID’s infection. His plan is to topple COVID before it even infects a potential host rather than focusing on submitting the already infected carrier to investigations that seek to eradicate the problem while inserting others. “I don’t want any compensation for my work that many labs worldwide tried to poach. I simply waited until my patent to this computation was filed and approved, which is why some would think I am late to this announcement on how to protect against COVID.” If COVID prevention was as simple as a buffer solution that suppresses the virus's lipophilic membrane by neutralizing its pH levels, that world-leading pharmaceutical companies and governments were not able to identify or intentionally overlooked such simpler methods that are not financially beneficial, then this would justify many COVID-based conspiracies against public health and the economy that the very few are gaining while safeguarding themselves on account of the significant population. Weather, protests, and turmoil against all known measures to halt the infection With colder and windy weathers, plus climate change, October is proving that this virus is staying for more extended periods of time and that its threat and damages against humanity‘s prosperity and growth are substantial. The surge in new cases has prompted administrations to adhere to even more unconventional protocols to protect public safety that is yet again deteriorating. Lockdowns, quarantines, and enforced social distancing are being reinstated, but in a brand new suit that hopes to keep the economy at bay. According to health officials in developed countries, administrations will start magnifying its surveillance on the residents to ensure stringent measures of following protocols. “Stricter measures shall safeguard the country once again, but must be on an extended basis with a much slower reopening.” Unfortunately, the world today is witnessing a growing case of social demonstrations against a particular form of injustice, inequality, or dissatisfaction, in addition to several uprisings seeking to topple a state-leading party. Such as Kyrgyzstan and Afghanistan, Egypt and Lebanon in the footsteps, many states are encountering a political backlash in the wake of a strong second-wave COVID surge around the world. As explained in “What is democracy?” the real enemies to leadership are not groups beyond the border, but the people within the border who have a populous power to keeping a president or causing peaceful-to-tragic domestic conditions that ripple in effect against the economy, security, and public health. The stricter and more unconventional methods advanced by governments need to be integrated before it is too late. The speed of vaccine development worries the public, to an extent With hopes of capturing COVID by the “wings,” governments are relying heavily on an approved vaccine by the end of the year. Besides ensuring better protocols than the last time, different task forces are evaluating varying options and making sure to avoid any new management error. According to officials in medical sectors from developing countries, many mistakes have been committed since the first wave in terms of organization and maintenance of public health. The next weeks will decide how well the world can respond to a virus outbreak globally. While world countries are betting on their pharmaceutical corporations to manufacture the “best anti-COVID vaccine,” the competition is becoming "toxic with foggy transparency," relying on factors in “uncommon alliances,“ according to analysts. The availability of different vaccines worldwide in a highly integrated world may cause countries to have a “disproportional distribution of results“ that may have a weighted reverse in the future of public health. A rushed process with a short term observation on various age groups, symptoms, test subjects, and immunity systems has a high chance of having a worrying risk factor for contributing to a certain level of predominant intolerance, compromised immunity, weaker bodily function, or other adverse long term effects from hasty chemical reliance, as identified by physicians from developing countries. A vaccine process usually takes between one to two decades for proper observation, manufacturing, quality control, clinical trials, evaluation, detection of abnormalities and adversity, assessments and investigatory examinations, approval, and production. Rushing this into mere months may be catastrophic given such a measure and magnitude has not been done before. Any effect, as well, may have the chance to being transmitted onto the next generations, which will begin a weakening genetic link of lower tolerance and more inferior capability for the body’s self-defense. “The best medicine is the body’s natural resources. Medicines of the modern centuries primarily halted our immunosystem evolution.” Unless this vaccine has been developed way before COVID landed? China is the winner in the COVID-created world race The country where the virus started and wildly burnt out is China. As shown in reports, the cases spiked and lived for a month or two until it was suddenly cut out, where nearly 96% of the cases recovered or discharged. The control was very tight that hindered the virus’s outbreak before the end of 2020’s first quarter. According to analysts, governments are greatly skeptical of such a kind of control that almost immediately stopped the spread locally but contributed to the massive pandemic. World leaders were expected to deliver the same results at an equal magnitude, given that the coronavirus has traveled from a foreign state to all around the world. Cutting transport from its feet seemed the most appropriate course of action. If trade continued and globalization not paused, leaders looked at a long term lifeline plan and severe scrutiny. As explained in “China and the next world order,” developed countries worldwide are demanding China to remunerate for damages, deaths, profit losses, and economic deterioration faced by them. At the same time, China grew more vigorous than ever in comparison. The Chinese economy enjoyed a substantial boost in demand from world countries regarding industrial equipment and machinery, besides the everyday goods from B2C/C2C markets. Masks worldwide became “nearly sold out everywhere by the first months of 2020,” as identified by businessmen from developing countries. When the demand for 3M masks and other medical equipment surged remarkably by governments and domestic manufacturers could not supply the demand, China was one of the first sales points that many dealers referred to. “Alibaba business was there when we needed it the most. We dealt with a multitude of medical equipment manufacturers.” Government contracts were fulfilled mainly thanks to the availability of Chinese factories and highly cost-effective prices. According to evaluations, China worked like clockwork within a highly efficient machine during a time of worldwide atrophy. When COVID cases were reducing worldwide before vaccines ever reached an advanced stage or at least approved for limited use, cases rose again. According to economists from developing countries, “the natural reduction in cases does not accommodate the plan or trouble.” To governments, the financial returns of a first-approved vaccine is not the only victory, but also the reputation associated as an economic and health leader in a pandemic wide crisis. CanSinoBio, the Chinese and leading anti-COVID vaccine pharmaceutical company, reached a very advanced stage with highly promising results compared to their Russian, American, and European counterparts. The speed was "fantastic and unusual." According to former officials, the benefitting bodies from a continuous surge in cases are pharmaceutical corporations and their stakeholders, which are ideally governments as well. So far, China seems to be triumphant that a few thousand lives were “worthwhile.”
All kinds of Consulting within fingertips. Nicely done
Great people, good outcomes. Something new and very interesting
Making a sophisticated type of work very simple and easy to use.
Our reliance on financial advisory will be geared towards Consulting Centrale, meeting many professionals all the time.
Je suis très content de Consulting Centrale. Enfin une application réellement utile.
Good software and presence in such a marketplace.
I love the exclusivity of the system where only qualified individuals from all backgrounds are involved.
This is real innovation in the most simple and sophisticated manner.
In a market where many consulting firms are available, this takes the lead.
Very efficient way of solving your business problems.
After making sure all our data is secure and confidential, we relied heavily on Consulting Centrale, as did most of our competitors in the industry.
Great system with very good support at all times.
Highly recommend others to join Consulting Centrale for real solutions.
I feel blessed as a company to have Consulting Centrale as a retainer for consultations.
I enjoy working at consulting centrale. I first considered it as a hobby or side hustle, but became my first hustle!
Individually or collaborating, this is a very joyful and fruitful experiential curve both professionally and socially.
Hard work in the old times turned to joyful work in the new times. It is quite fantastic consulting a multitude of companies at the same arena.
As someone who did not find a suitable opportunity in my city, I was very happy to have found Consulting Centrale, who allowed me to use my skills wherever I am. Thank you!
I lost my job due to COVID-19 a part of a downscaling restructuring by my former consulting firm. From darkness there shall be light. Consulting Centrale is the light in all sense of revolution, tomorrow’s technology, professionalism, and simplicity.
Consulting Centrale renovated the professional services environment. I feel sorry for the firms of yesterday!
This will renovate the way we will do things as advisors. The industry will become more assimilated to tech and improvements.
As a single parent with skills and experience in commercial and contracts law, I was not able to find suitable work because of the long workin hours in my field, and my only child that is few months old needs me. Consulting Centrale allowed me to both work and earn with my hard work, plus take care of my child. That is a dream come true.
I always wanted to work for top companies worldwide, but didn’t know which one to go for. Consulting Centrale made the dream of working multiple companies at the same time true.
Consulting companies, show my skills, having fun collaborating and learning, increase my rating, gaining, socializing, and have a unique scorecard? This is a professional game-like environment that everyone fantasizes!
At my old position, I worked 16 hours straight for much of the week, and without enough gratitude and balanced return. Now I earn according to my effort. I am happy to be named a consultant at Consulting Centrale.
7 days trial to get a first-hand view of how the system works.Request a free demo
7 days trial to get a first hand experience from our talented consultants.Request a free trial