The system is mainly built upon connecting companies with the consultants from all around the world. The consultants will have access to corporate cases presented by companies to analyze thoroughly and provide solutions, individually or within groups.
Companies post issues as
many as they want
Companies will rate the
solutions and skills
Consultants will get paid for
solutions and ratings
"Global positioning, Domestic application, Glocal solutions."
Find any service within minutes and know exactly what
you’ll pay. No hourly rates, just a fixed price.
Payment is released to the consultants once you’re
pleased and approve the work you get.
We’re here for you, anything from answering any
questions to resolving any issues, at any time.
One-time Cost-effective subscription for an unlimited amount of cases periodically to be presented to top-notch consultants worldwide reached within fingertips.
One-stop-shop for all kinds of qualified professionals in all industries and fields seeking to learn, gain, collaborate, and show their skills in consulting companies from all over the world.
IT Project Management
Lean Service Operations
Supply Chain Management
Market Entry Strategy
Business Plan DevelopmentExample
Sales & Pricing
How did the taxing system evolve over the previous centuries? What are the major factors contributing to ever-changing policies that are rarely perfected? Are current tax regimes the most efficient strategies of ensuring legal activities of entities and profit-sharing with the government? Are tax policymakers knowledgeable of all relevant conditions of commerce and trade in a country? How transparent are fiscal matters of natural persons and legal entities? Modern tax regimes are imperfect and filled with socio-economic obstacles [ap_dropcaps style="ap-normal"]T[/ap_dropcaps]axes are a fiscally ambiguous subject that responsible authorities and branches of governments are often never confident about. The understanding of taxation distinguished from regular comprehension of perfect policy and the changing economic environment cultivated the need for ever-adapting regime modifications, often with every changing government. Democracies’ main economic subject, concerning government budgeting and billing, usually outlines the need for a reformation to a different, not necessarily better, version of it. Microeconomics history of state speaks for itself on such matters relative to continuing unbalanced management of monetary distribution. So far, leading parties of developed countries outlining the renovated policies succeeded in issuing a unified taxing standard that guarantees a major, yet not unanimous, double-digit involvement. According to fiscal analysts, the participation of taxed persons that account for almost 50% of the population comes to nearly 70-80%. Real contributions rarely barely meet forecasts and expectations of government tax returns. The problem majorly lies in dissatisfaction with tax policies, increasingly changing environment, renovated ways of untaxable income, and disconnection between recorded book numbers and actual figures. The main issue attributed to modern policy taxation is the fact that it is based on income. Income reporting, especially at legal entities, is majorly influenced by bookkeeping and accounting where human flaws, errors, uncertainty, legal loopholes, and commercial desires play a significant role. According to accounting bodies, a substantial percentage of professionals contributions to manually input inaccurate data negligently, mainly due to novel digital reporting systems coming from accounting transformations. In 2013, US companies were hit with a penalty amounting to $7 billion only due to inaccurate accounting stemming from negligence. Federal entities require extensive attention to auditing companies' positions to maintain accuracy, which is also a budget load on the government, given the continuous monitoring and oversight on cash flows and streams of income. Nevertheless, other than fixed employment salaries for natural persons, returns from extra benefits, side deals, or external businesses are usually not declared and excluded from tax. Imposing a fiscal charge on a circulating current of money is not only tricky but also a major contributor to out of business, sometimes illegal, activities. According to simulation on the taxation of natural persons, a significant portion of individuals is at unease regarding the periodic tax payments, which either pushes them to not accurately record their sources or work for returns outside the scope of their registered job and income. The need to eradicating modern tax regimes and resolving policies to reforming society Tax is hindering the equal distribution of wealth by focusing on equal enforcement and not equal policy. As explained in “lack of monetary supervision and neglecting the need of investment protection risks rising troubles in the global economy,” money that needs to be ever-circulating is recently finding an endpoint due to modern-day issuance of assets and securities specialized for concealing transactions and identities, hiding the trail of money, and increasing digital anonymity within interactions, hence recording taxable goods and income are lacking. Policies on tax rate per income are only effective on matters relevant to controlling cash inflows. However, not very productive for the government. Modern-day tax regime needs to encounter a radical change to ensure equal distribution of wealth, equal access to care, and reduced poverty, all by altering the purpose of tax to a mandatory donation. Annual mandatory donations are a yearly contribution to the government on the value of commercial, liquid, and short term assets imposed on all types of individuals with possession or ownership. This donation should be provided mostly to the lower and poor class in a community through the government as the mediator who shall ensure proper distribution of funds. This tiny contribution from wealth goes so far in terms of returns to the government, who will provide equal access to rights, reducing poverty, and lessening the number of charges imposed on every individual. Giving back to the community and being socially responsible allows a stronger current to the flow of money between all types of individuals while majorly reducing financial crimes relative to accounting and fiscal data, contributing to lower economic strains on natural persons and legal entities while ensuring injections and continuous flow into the economy. The benefits of the policy reformation display the radical change needed today This donation shall replace the income tax, so individuals are free to enjoy any legal type or source of income without incurring a specifically inequivalent fiscal charge. When supplying an amount of money in the name of donation to the unfortunate, it contributes to eradicating the commercialization of central pillars of a community. Access to education and healthcare at all social levels must be free; this ensures a standup community with the proper knowledge, health, and customary norms. In the modern-day and age, healthcare and education are quite pricy, especially to the middle and lower class individuals in developed countries, which pushes for varying sources of illegal activities for a particular income source. Mandatory donation is a mechanism to ensure accurate scaling of wealth and social responsibility between all types of individuals and legal entities. According to individuals from the middle class, they’re disturbed by the equal treatment given to unequal individuals, where rich people provide an almost similar fiscal charge as they do even if incomes and wealth are mostly differing, hereby remaining economically powerful and influential. In some developing countries, the rich are sometimes exempted from tax. This method of wrong-capitalism empowerment causes socio-political unrest firstly, and economic turmoil secondly, where accuracy in the declaration of accounts is the first victim. When scaling the mandatory donations, individuals will comprehend an equal treatment according to wealth, which eventually reflects on the budget for education and healthcare that are usually costly in many developed countries, thus allowing everyone to pay their fair share, having equal access, and keeping everyone satisfied and comfortable. Major troubles of taxation and the influence of the higher class in society Issues such as double taxation and value-added taxes shall be resolved given that a significant portion of people is troubled by them. According to economic analysts, value-added tax policies are inversely correlated with anti-trust concerns of a market, in which as long as VATs remain or increase, competitions will decrease given that it directly contributes to controlling the market expenses. Commissions that are working to ensure fair involvement of the free market are overlooking the more critical regime stemming from monetary policymakers and hierarchy, which is why many businesses are usually forced to fix their prices to avoid drowning or be eaten by cash-rich predatory competitors. If the market is genuinely free from control, so should its primary basis that influence its activity. According to a simulation on mandatory donations and the wealthy class, the mandatory donation is the primary driver to avoiding monetary circulation among the rich. Even though the modern tax regime contributed to levying incomes, other than continuous exemptions by the government, it also drove the steady increase in personal wealth for the rich. According to campaign managers for the rich, their usual way of enjoying continuous tax cuts and exemptions is through “public and moral” quid pro quos, whereby ensuring public charitable donations to causes that are usually funneled by movements, politics, and administration. This is why the rich are almost always categorized as philanthropists in addition to their standard titles. Modern politics of philanthropy is an enemy to the equal rights to wealth and policies of taxation. According to news sources, groups penetrating foreign countries’ politics such as rogue militias and opposition parties are frequently backed by foreign bodies shelled in many layers under the name of a particular foundation thriving on charitable benefactions, knowingly and unknowingly, indirectly linking to ambitious, rich bodies. As explained in “the hidden democracy of governments,” certain leading bodies, often from the financially wealthy group of society, are the most ambitiously determined groups to overtake third-world arenas under their command and control. When inquiring about this issue with one of them, they claim it be “preposterous.” Yet their names are all over it. A specific foundation in the name of a particular prince in the Middle East has been denoted as a front for frequent illicit activities internally and abroad to quelling any attempt to the opposition, penetrating and controlling foreign administrations, silencing freedom writers, acquiring specific goods or services, and funneling unrecorded or laundered money. In this situation, being above the law, or above local tax regimes, allows for a lack of oversight, thereby contributing to a more massive gap in inequality, shackling freedoms, and discrimination of wealth that tax policies were not able to solve. Taxation across the years frequently adjusts to half picture of the economy The ongoing talks of adaptation to inflation and adjustment of the minimum wage in developed countries are directly linked to imperfect tax regimes. Taxing the poor is impossible. Taxing the incomes of small and medium enterprises that retain them is inaccurate, given the usual minimal capital availability, especially in times such as COVID. According to a survey on business owners, taxing incomes always halts the growth of companies, where if it was removed, they would less rely on debts or loans from financial institutions. According to a relationship study, taxes and loans are directly correlated, where as tax portions increase, so is the need for loans to funding plans. Increased taxes are also a direct result of increased government debt, provided that governments rely primarily on tax returns that rarely satisfy the full branch of government expenditure; hence tax adjustments become frequent while depending on debt from central banks and international institutions for financing. The privatization of public entities is also a significant domain for wealthy players to avoid taxation. Given their contributions to public infrastructure and supporting a branch of government, part of its perks are fiscal exemptions. The reason behind the continuous growth of modern-wrong capitalism is the constant reliance on the rich to building the country, thereby controlling it. Governments themselves are not able to self sustain through imperfect regimes or policies that require consistent adjustments. According to officials from developed countries, public contracts are usually designated to attract a larger share of heavy pockets, domestic or foreign, not only to finance operations but also to be in the network for events and causes. Such parties are usually the benefactors of countries’ leadership, where “sustaining them is a full-time job." The policy reformation will ensure equal benefits and access to rights Replacing tax policies with mandatory donations in a country would contribute to keeping the government afloat. The equal portion of contributions by all people to a government that will ensure equal distribution to infrastructure and lower class individuals will empower a state built on economic equality. This majorly tackles many demands displayed by manifestations, movements, and protests seeking an equal distribution of wealth, opportunity, and eradicating capitalism. Modern capitalism is built on Big Brother control, as explained in “single thinking is a theory more than reality in an ongoing Big brother world,” where the few is controlling the most through modern-day surveillance means and ensuring that everyone accepts the supreme power that is based on biased theological beliefs. The contribution of mandatory donations will ensure an accurate, moral, and ethical “capitalism“ where individuals from all classes thrive and prosper, and the rich remain wealthy without one-sided involvement or circulation. This will also bring down many unethically capitalist entities that have an immoral and illegal base.
What is the ultimate outcome of injustice? How is it formed and integrated between countries? Did international equivalences of diplomatic principles tackle such matters? Who are the primary groups responsible for ensuring justice? Can individuals manifest their existence without encountering problems? Is it a top-bottom or bottom-up approach? Injustice is presented by the judicial order of natural persons and legal entities [ap_dropcaps style="ap-normal"]I[/ap_dropcaps]njustice is one of today’s major problems faced in society stemming from undemocratic governance that directly result in socio-political unrest and indirectly result in economic insecurity. It is mainly viewed upon the judicial structure of the country where the administration of justice and its outcomes are evaluated. According to a survey on confidence in courtrooms, being right is not always a winning trait. Presenting all evidence is also not a decisive factor. But “being politically connected is always a winner.” The disproportional asymmetry derived from the identity of judicial equality viewed in this scenario in comprehending the methods of legal success is damaging socially on the long term, where children of these countries could grow up understanding that practical rights and ethics are exercised quite differently from actual and required justice, hence become challenging to adjust. According to “Demanding radical change requires psycho-graphically understanding ourselves and target bodies,” leaders of countries are usually of advanced age, and the mentality of such age groups are hardened due to crystallized wisdom where adapting to the environment or changing preestablished habits are near impossible, which also represents a government structure. Unfortunately, as explained in “The judicial system's reality check and its reformation 188.8.131.52,” the quality of lawyers represents the data-proven confidence interval of success in courtrooms. A statistics study shows that a significant portion of judges and jury are usually swayed more with expensive, well-known attorneys. Whereas for the parties who are financially unfortunate they can only take up average or lower-cost lawyers and hence are usually “doomed“ by this injustice. This understanding exhibited in centralized governments or penetrated democracies is the reason behind unwanted social discrimination and inequality, where rights are not affirmed or transparent. Civilized countries’ leaderships in modern times assume a “just order“ as part of their mission and open-ended obligations; yet, exercising it may be a different story. According to political science statisticians, judicial decisions’ approval ratings presented by the population are “usually below par.” Justice is the pillar of democracy where any crack will lead to a fall Democracy’s basic structure relies on the pillars of justice, where if it was broken or cracked, the structure of the entire country is shaky and near collapsible. Many democracies’ political systems have collapsed disastrously as a result of continuous injustices, rendering them uncivilized or outdated with several conflicting parties. According to analysts, South American democracies are a prime example of organizational collapse from one-sided politics and encompassing injustice. Their fundamental understanding of justice is dependent upon the hierarchy of power, which is also why drug cartels were and still are able to rule publicly and secretly. Such as the nephews of the Venezuelan First Lady who were caught in Haiti with a large number of addictive drugs to illegally smuggle and trade them in the USA. This kind of issues majorly contributes to continuous rebellions or uprising attempts in the name of stabilizing the foundation of governance. On April of 2019, Juan Gaido, a Venezuelan politician, led a failing coup attempt, alongside US backing, against the Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. The interference of foreign elements in the name of stabilizing another state's democracy, as explained in "The hidden democracy of governments," leaves governance open to penetrations that may rely on supplying specified demands in return for aiding in the reach to power. From an international perspective, deducing the justice of both sides is difficult given the matters of diplomacy against human rights and survival. Such unrests lie on the unclear foundation of justice, which is mostly reliant on the judicial administration of socio-political order. The reaction to injustice usually exceeds socially accepted behavior People’s humanistic reaction to injustice is usually fight or flight. Both responses are defective, given the means are generally unrest and trouble or turmoil and tragedy, affirming the need for justice to be liberated from the top and not the bottom. In its original form, the delivery of politics and leadership is a top-bottom approach that produces strategies and policies for all the groups to follow. Injustice, running in the same political structure, follows this approach. However, when inquiring from presidents who faced rebellions or manifestations, they frequently claim that “injustice is real from the bottom. If they do not trust us, they will unfairly judge us, and turmoil will happen. This is often bottom-top.” As ignorant as that may seem, all parties to the state need to transparently communicate and resolve injustices, including both leaders and individuals. According to a relationship study, injustice is directly correlated with crime, where if injustice increases, so does crime. When the law becomes breakable or overlooked by any entity or individual of a community, people rely on self-knowledge and character-based ethics. As explained in the “codification of customary social laws 184.108.40.206,” societies need to create, embed, and integrate customary social laws regarding particular standards to maintain a unified understanding of principles and integrity that directly mold interactions and behaviors. Social norms need to be airtight in order to preserve the national order of things. Injustice is known to be a contributor to hierarchy and increased discrimination of all kinds. The increasing gap in wealth distribution and “winner, or powerful, takes all” is flourished by unequal commercial benefits and organized shareholding of the market. As explained in “The era after COVID may not be as comfortable,” cash-rich oligopolies during COVID-19 have been able to take market shares with minimal effort given the lower circulation of money and economic abnormality caused by decreased demand, where many smaller entities and competitors could not bear. Democracy must be defined appropriately or administered accurately The social transformation of things after WWII confirmed a deeper level of injustice after a series of physical struggles as rising civilizations clashed. According to political scientists, “wickedness in the name of peace,” this describes the structural issue pertaining to the latest century, where evil is manifested through democracy. The art of modern politics requires strong adaptation and dynamism, whereby only a cunningly ingenious individual can master its skills precisely, as opposed to how movies usually end where the righteous in society wins. Individuals from different generations adapted to the politics of their respective periods, hence the imbalanced comprehension of order. If justice and ethics prevail, so will the social order and livelihoods of people. If injustice and inequality prevail, so will the people coping with the prerequisites of success. If true democracy was firmly and transparently embedded, the injustice of the modern society would fade. Injustice is the driver of inequality, and inequality is the driver of poverty. Poverty is the first result of injustice Poverty is a primary social issue of the modern world that is usually related to the unequal distribution of wealth on an international scale. However, according to a simulation, it can be resolved with affirming justice on a domestic and international level. Countries with high levels of poverty, usually stemming from unemployment and will government debts, are the ones known to have a higher magnitude of injustice. Injustice is positively correlated with poverty; hence a step towards justice would mean a step towards ending poverty. Such states often have governments’ officials usually use their political power as a means for a financial monopoly. This monopoly directly influences local economic conditions with respect to inaccurate monetary policies and imprecise political order. Given that governments are macroeconomically integrated, whereby genuinely,” this often leads to severe levels of inflation and severe devaluation of the currency, rendering the already low social class people to an even deeper financial abyss. Since CPI is relative to consumer goods, and certain goods or materials needed for the domestic production of goods are usually imported, business expenses increase, and life gets more difficult to sustain by the stakeholders. If the country was self-sufficient, without the excessive interference of international trade for import or export, amidst just leadership, it could steadily flourish. Fixing the errors of injustice firstly requires acknowledgment of its existence and relative social outcomes by the entities responsible for the people’s livelihoods. This allows individuals from all groups to be readily prepared to review and evaluate courses of action that may tackle each and every issue. Secondly, entities need to identify and spread awareness regarding the measurements to be undertaken to resolve all kinds of injustice, whereby all parties to a community get involved and aiding to the step towards prosperous civilization, Globalization is the cause of modern economic abnormality and injustice between nations If the world is searching for genuine globalization, equality and ethical oversee should be accommodated. The issue of power-wielding states around the world that move decisions in international organizations according to their command, mostly enforced on third world countries, is an obstacle to local socio-political development. Prior to the era that marked globalization and integration of civilizations centuries ago, countries relied on themselves commercially, agriculturally, and politically, where self-governance and self-learning according to centuries of changing leaderships were more appropriately placed and positioned given the environment and society. According to experts of history cultures, states used to govern themselves as per their cultural teachings. They grew exponentially and adapted through every stage of development, where domestic democracy seemed to grow stronger than today’s international modern transformations. Economic abnormalities and clandestine control of markets are a result of modern economic unification. If a country recedes economically, its financial problems should be upset and not rippled to neighboring states; yet, as difficult as that may be, a higher level of macroeconomic disintegration from the digital unity with more focus on local sufficiency could be a solution. According to scientists, the world population is at “dangerous levels” in terms of Earth's capacity to withhold. All environmental changes such as global warming and climate change are not only a result of increased fossil consumption and pollution but also human desires to expand and take over more lands that are not naturally meant to be attained by man. Injustice by people on nature and green Earth is also a matter that firstly led to cultural decay, extinction of long-lasted values and civilizations, and negative impacts upon the creatures of Earth. The consequence of desires over preservation will lead to more dangerous natural responses geologically. This dispute should find a solution before it is too late. Justice stems from the order of governance, where if it is genuinely administered, people and nature will prosper.
How are struggles often communicated between states? What would the most significant difference be between today and yesterday’s politics of wars? How are data gathered and presented in a democracy for authorizing military movement? Were the declarations of war of the last century a more professional demeanor than today’s usual one-sided authorizations? The disintegration of war declaration caused severe mishaps of accurate data and reliable intelligence [ap_dropcaps style="ap-normal"]S[/ap_dropcaps]ince the Second World war, most governments have decided to stop formal writings declaring a position of war over another state. This formal announcement was used as a part of conflict documentation per leader overseeing a required course for using military forces against target regimes. This declaration usually comes after approval from equal or higher bodies than the government, given the severity of the case. According to former military officials from developed countries, this declaration ensures that all parties have the complete picture and knowledge regarding the reasons and grounds about a certain regime, without covering any sort of evidence from decision-makers. In times like these, technology was not very advanced, where governments relied on pens, papers, and more levels of formalities. “Recent times, the war was occurring because of the silliest matters. If formal declarations were still followed, where complete information is presented thoroughly through more face to face transmission of information, nearly all the wars would be unnecessary. Our presidents seem to have a mental dictator-complex.” Without such a declaration, leaders become “tyrants” in picking and choosing the claims that fit most by suspicious witnesses. It causes a decision-maker to fabricate data and invent false missions under the name of democracy and peace, where every party becomes a loser. Where necessary, declarations and legislative hoops require a complete understanding of operations that are usually used to ensure the one and only target is the regime without direct civilian targeting. The essence of war declarations and their level of transparency lies in the level of democracy in sovereignty. By formally signing this declaration, the executive, legislative, and judicial bodies of the democracy should majorly, if not unitedly, sign on this measure of last resort, by understanding the comprehensive information of the mission, which is very costly in terms of financing, political stability, and human lives. According to former war veterans from developed countries that engaged in wars after World War II, many official bodies objected to the military engagements to nearly all struggles where the decision at high confidence was majorly a red light, given the data provided. However, given the development of politics in the last century, political loopholes were recognized, whereby certain leaders stopped formal declarations and followed the command of authorization, executing a constitutional provision that embodies the power ensued by the leading body to resort to physical conflict. In this regard, democracy began to be questioned where dictatorship-like methods began to be integrated. This is apparent in wars where evidence was lacking, inaccurate, or unjustified. Moreover, those counties that engaged in recent wars did not properly utilize nor trust the necessity for thorough and extensive negotiations or diplomatic methods of communication that a civilization demands, where a big gap in misunderstanding was displayed by analysts of the post-war outcomes and evaluations, mostly concluding the steps carried out by one partial body pushing strongly in the direction of physical confrontation without regard to the costs thereof. Their focus seemed to be more personal and remaining on top than saving lives in redemption. According to an analysis on the development of diplomacy between countries, even though technology developed greatly and helped country leaderships reach out to each other at ease without misunderstanding, promoting resolutions at a diplomatic level, conflicts are still ongoing where “covert“ wars are more frequent than full-fledged wars, often stemming from spying and espionage activities that most governments often carry out yet no one approves or legalizes. The only variable that may impact these decisions is the political landscape per country and hence their hidden objectives. A country’s leadership is a direct influencer of “facts“ that justifies recourses. According to analysts from the USA, when Donald Trump issued the travel ban on certain states in the Middle East, his justification was due to the existence of rogue militia groups that can cause havoc on American soil. Outrageous as it is and directly contradicting facts, historical statistics showed that the major demographic of crime and terrorist-like activities in the USA were homegrown from within America, non-Islamic faith, and often irrelevant to these specific states, where the numbers are highly disproportional in terms of crime performing. Nonetheless, as explained in “the hidden democracy of governments,” such rogue groups usually present on Arab countries are often backed by foreign entities and not even homegrown, where its political leadership is based overseas with specific objectives paving the road for local baseless individuals believing in a false cause. These groups are also a supplementary cause of the novel matters of invasion. Through deductive reasoning, a travel ban should be issued on individuals from developed Western states. Previously, invasions were more physical. As technology, diplomacy, and globalization developed, it became more covert and solely on a country's leadership, where the top management supplies the demands of the benefactor, as what few countries are explicitly showing. Day by day, politics seems to be more than two-faced, where principles and values are being neglected. Organizations and the very expensive war that represent truer "leadership" Military alliances are also considered another legal loophole against the importance of the national declaration of war, where neighboring and similar-principles countries unite to be the first level of defense against third world threats. NATO is a prime example of a military organizational alliance where if one country gets attacked, or seeks to attack another, they should have each others’ back no matter what. Its creation also marked the end of these formal declarations and transcribed into a “new world order,” as stated by American presidents of that time. This is also a fiercely debated matter between the USA, who is a very active member of the organization, and European member states, who favor diplomacy over physical confrontation. This coalition is designed to defend territories, usually against third world countries that do not have nuclear weapons or extensive military power in return. According to intelligence sources and proven evidence, the driver of the false justifications behind the Iraq war, 2003, is George Bush’s heavy dictator complex, steadily gunning for Saddam Hussein arising from "personal emotions of hatred and false redemption.” As explained in “the tragic democracy in the Arab world,” even though intelligence bodies advised Bush of Saddam’s disconnection with OBL and Al Qaeda, after series of cunning brainstorming sessions, fabricated data, outrageous claims, and misleading accusations that eventually turned into baseless facts used as evidence to convince the American congressional body and senate for a green light on the offensive war provision under the constitution. Psychologically, if an individual wants to believe something, they would do so even if the base or structure is broken. This was also a political play to first convince the American people of how their tax dollars are going to be largely spent, and the human lives to be withered by both ends. The US government forecasted a 2-year involvement and totaling $100billion. This later become a 7-year involvement totaling nearly $3trillion, and that is only for the American military forces. Iraq, and other stakeholders to the war, are incurring an even larger payback that is yet neverending. The largest wronged group, from this baseless invasion, are the innocent 108,000 Iraqi civilians and families that died as collateral to simply take down the regime that was toppled since the first months, and nearly 16 million Iraqis displaced. Given that uprising and "treacherous" Iraqi bodies were the primary intelligence providers to American forces, US command should have endured a quicker involvement with lower human and financial costs to taking down the government, “saving lives,” so as they say. According to a simulation on American soldiers from the Iraq war, most of them were often unsure of commands that very frequently lacked accurate or precise information, where they were asked to “drown our morals” to be able to keep going. “Intel was lacking from day one. Even months before announcing the authorization for military movement. WMDs did not exist, and intel for connections to outer terrorism were falsified.” According to a simulation on ongoing intentions and goals, some countries in organizations such as NATO have a direct, one-sided, democracy-killing goal that is based on certain beliefs and ethnocentric power containment where old predictions and strategies are the drivers of decisions. Some Israeli analysts portray their “true” land ownership extends from the Euphrates River in the east to the Nile in the west, where the religious dispute is the main subject between Islam and Judaism, hence the lands as well, indirectly demanding for larger land annexation, invasion, and bloodshed. Even after UAE and Bahrain’s normalization of ties with Israel, and accepting the religion, belief, and values into the countries, there still are plans to overgrow and take over more area. Through hidden governments, it is already underway; yet, physical movements would cause even more trauma on the very sensitive state of the Middle East. As explained in “international law explained in reality,” democracy became “democrisy” when hypocritical and dynamic politics based on parties' positioning than the situation is followed, reversing the structure into a hidden dictatorship.
All kinds of Consulting within fingertips. Nicely done
Great people, good outcomes. Something new and very interesting
Making a sophisticated type of work very simple and easy to use.
Our reliance on financial advisory will be geared towards Consulting Centrale, meeting many professionals all the time.
Je suis très content de Consulting Centrale. Enfin une application réellement utile.
Good software and presence in such a marketplace.
I love the exclusivity of the system where only qualified individuals from all backgrounds are involved.
This is real innovation in the most simple and sophisticated manner.
In a market where many consulting firms are available, this takes the lead.
Very efficient way of solving your business problems.
After making sure all our data is secure and confidential, we relied heavily on Consulting Centrale, as did most of our competitors in the industry.
Great system with very good support at all times.
Highly recommend others to join Consulting Centrale for real solutions.
I feel blessed as a company to have Consulting Centrale as a retainer for consultations.
I enjoy working at consulting centrale. I first considered it as a hobby or side hustle, but became my first hustle!
Individually or collaborating, this is a very joyful and fruitful experiential curve both professionally and socially.
Hard work in the old times turned to joyful work in the new times. It is quite fantastic consulting a multitude of companies at the same arena.
As someone who did not find a suitable opportunity in my city, I was very happy to have found Consulting Centrale, who allowed me to use my skills wherever I am. Thank you!
I lost my job due to COVID-19 a part of a downscaling restructuring by my former consulting firm. From darkness there shall be light. Consulting Centrale is the light in all sense of revolution, tomorrow’s technology, professionalism, and simplicity.
Consulting Centrale renovated the professional services environment. I feel sorry for the firms of yesterday!
This will renovate the way we will do things as advisors. The industry will become more assimilated to tech and improvements.
As a single parent with skills and experience in commercial and contracts law, I was not able to find suitable work because of the long workin hours in my field, and my only child that is few months old needs me. Consulting Centrale allowed me to both work and earn with my hard work, plus take care of my child. That is a dream come true.
I always wanted to work for top companies worldwide, but didn’t know which one to go for. Consulting Centrale made the dream of working multiple companies at the same time true.
Consulting companies, show my skills, having fun collaborating and learning, increase my rating, gaining, socializing, and have a unique scorecard? This is a professional game-like environment that everyone fantasizes!
At my old position, I worked 16 hours straight for much of the week, and without enough gratitude and balanced return. Now I earn according to my effort. I am happy to be named a consultant at Consulting Centrale.
7 days trial to get a first-hand view of how the system works.Request a demo
7 days trial to get a first hand experience from our talented consultants.Request a free trial